You don’t work in wine. That’s the point. The discipline for governing all six capitals—financial, human, intellectual, reputational, political, and social—rather than the one on the income statement is what Solve Next calls Capital Symmetry Governance™. Think Wrong is its activation discipline, and the Intensive is where you learn to run it. Over four and a half days in Provence, a small cohort of leaders builds four capabilities—Identify, Imagine, Test, Align—on a live challenge inside the wine industry, then carries the practice home to the AI investments, growth bets, market entries, and transformation decisions where their own capital is at stake. For most leaders in the room, the AI decision is now the largest allocation resting on the least tested assumptions. The laboratory is wine. The work is yours.
Most organizations are having one of two AI conversations right now. One is loud—pilots multiplying, vendors compared, nobody willing to be the one who is behind. The other is quiet: a leader who suspects the spend is resting on something untested, and has no language to say so without sounding like a laggard. Both positions are made of untested assumptions, and the same discipline resolves either one.
That is Capital Distortion—capital moving with confidence in one direction while the evidence underneath it goes unexamined, and the other five capitals move unmeasured. The laboratory is wine. The work is yours. You learn faster inside an industry that isn’t your own because its assumptions are visible to an outsider—you didn’t inherit them, so you can see them. That is the transferable skill: reading the beliefs a category has stopped questioning, and then reading your own.
A domaine under pressure isn’t failing at wine-making. It built value in one place while the forces that decide whether that value lasts drifted, unmeasured. The same pattern—building confidently in one direction while other forms of capital quietly erode—shows up in every organization that watches only its financial results.
Working someone else’s industry lowers the defensiveness and the politics. You reframe, test, and align in real conditions, then carry the capability—not the wine answer—home.
Every day ends by applying the day’s practice to a challenge you actually own. By Friday you can name at least one assumption in your organization that belongs to the same category you’ve spent the week exposing in wine.
Wine is running the same AI decisions you are, in plain sight: yield and weather models, provenance and counterfeit detection, how a bottle gets recommended, how distribution gets routed. It is also a category whose value sits in judgment, taste, and relationships—so the line between what AI extends and what a person must still decide is easier to see from the outside. You practice finding that line here, then find it at home.
The laboratory is wine; the capabilities are yours. You practice all four—each anchored to one full day—against real stakeholders in a live industry, then transfer them to your own decisions. The four capabilities run on six practices; the practices are the how. AI runs through all four—it widens what you can generate and how much evidence you can read. It does not make the call.
Frame the right problem before solving it. Reframe past the obvious answer with the Deflection Point, then name which of the six forms of capital each move builds. Most consequential decisions fail not because the team executed poorly, but because they solved the wrong version of the problem.
Generate widely before judging, converge deliberately, and make the strongest option tangible enough to react to. You think better against something real, so you build to learn rather than to debate. This is the capability the category most often skips. With AI in the room the test gets harder rather than easier: previously infeasible, not merely faster.
Separate what you know from what you believe with the Certainty Map and PAK—Presumptions, Assumptions, Knowledge. Isolate the Super Vital Assumption—the belief that, if wrong, would change a capital decision only your CFO or CEO can authorize—and design the smallest credible bet to buy that evidence. For a leader carrying an AI investment, this is where the assumptions underneath it finally get named.
A move no one will carry is not a move. Threaded through every day and brought home on Friday: map who must act, who decides, and who can block; name the owner and the real trade for each; and convert assent into a dated commitment on your own live challenge.
Each full day follows the same rhythm: reflect on yesterday, an expert talk and discussion, an introduction to the Think Wrong frameworks and tools, application in the field, a share of what you found, then a reflection that applies it to your own challenge—closing with a daily reception. Half-day arrival Monday; full days Tuesday through Friday. 1:AI runs through every capability day—AI as a third party in the room, and a daily read on where its answer is simply the category’s answer repeated back with confidence.
Afternoon arrival at Château de Beaupré, our home base in the Pays d’Aix, about twenty minutes from central Aix-en-Provence. Welcome and industry immersion, then an introduction to the Serious Capital Framework—the participant-facing view of the six forms of capital—financial, human, intellectual, reputational, political, and social—that sits inside Capital Symmetry™—and to the capital activator role you’ll step into for the week. Opening reception with wine-industry hosts.
Using Think Wrong to identify and frame capital-building opportunities—and to engage and align the people who matter most. Morning: an expert talk and the Deflection Point in the classroom. Afternoon: application in the field with a multigenerational domaine and structured market interviews. You run the reframe twice—once in the room, once 1:AI—and compare where the model reproduces the answer the category already believes. Evening: reflect and map the day’s practice onto a challenge you own.
Using Think Wrong to generate capital-building solutions—and to engage and align the people who matter most. Generate widely, converge deliberately, and make the strongest option tangible. 1:AI supplies divergent volume against the frame you set; convergence stays yours. Application in the field with a new-model producer who has broken the category’s rules, then a share and a reflection onto your own challenge.
Using Think Wrong to prioritize and test Super Vital Assumptions—and to engage and align the people who matter most. Certainty Map and PAK in the morning, run as a PAK Lab with AI as a third party—useful for surfacing candidate assumptions, useless for deciding which one is vital. A field test of the vital assumptions in the afternoon in front of real stakeholders, where a guided tasting becomes the instrument: sensory evidence against a claim, which is judgment training of the oldest kind.
Close of Day 3—the escalation question. Each participant is asked one question about their own organization: “Of the assumptions we surfaced—which ones, if wrong, would change a capital allocation decision that only your CFO or CEO can authorize?” Responses are documented. It is the designed bridge to the governance conversation that can follow.
A full day. A panel discussion with wine-industry experts opens it, then you turn the week on your own organization: a self-assessment reads your readiness across the four capabilities, the capability ladder maps your path of progress, and the 30-Day Habit Builder in Next Lab™ sets up your first thirty days back. The transfer includes the AI decision you arrived with: which of its assumptions are Super Vital, and where a person on your team must stay decisive once the deployment lands. Departure Friday evening.
The four capabilities are the what; these six practices are the how. Four have a home in the week; two run everywhere—Let Go across all four, Move Fast concentrated at Align. The named drills and instruments you meet in the room—the Deflection Point, the Certainty Map, the Small Bet—live inside these six.
Name a capital-building opportunity the financial lens can’t see—to create, protect, or liberate capital. Home: Identify.
Leave the financial-reporting view and go to where human, intellectual, reputational, political, and social capital actually move; anchor what you find in what people have done, not what they say they’ll do. Home: Identify.
The horizontal practice: it runs across all four capabilities. Release the brain’s biases and the organization’s orthodoxies, and keep option value alive.
Render the move as a testable hypothesis you can examine for which capital it builds, in which domain, and at what cost to the others. Home: Imagine and develop.
The engine. Test the Super Vital Assumptions through the smallest credible action—Return on Investment becomes Learn from Investment—so belief becomes evidence a CFO can stand behind. Core to Test; its design begins in Imagine, where the made thing and the small bet are the same object.
The cross-cutting practice. Hold velocity so learning outpaces the capital commitment, then share what you learn to bring people into committed action—its sharing work concentrated in Align.
Where the discipline gets deployed. Think Wrong runs in five settings, nested from inside out—1:self, 1:AI, 1:1, 1:Team, and 1:Many. Each contains the ones before it. 1:AI is the setting you will use most on Monday morning: whichever model your organization supports, run as a third party in the room rather than as an oracle. AI gives divergent volume. You give convergent judgment. The discipline is the asset, not the tool—and Next Lab™ holds the drills as designed prompt sequences you can run against whatever your organization has approved.
Whether the need is real, which assumption is Super Vital, and what capital to commit against it. AI reasons and evaluates. It does not decide, and it will not tell you that the question you handed it was the wrong one.
The unstated power, the culture, how people move when they are not being rational. AI can map an organization chart. It cannot feel who holds power in a room, and it cannot be let down.
Making genuinely new things from what already exists. AI can feed the leap with volume and perspective. It cannot perform it, and it cannot stake a reputation on the result.
Protect the human edge. Naming where a person must stay decisive is not a sentiment. It is a design constraint you apply before the deployment, not after. Leave it unnamed and you have built a substitute and called it a partnership.
Every Capital Activator Intensive—open or commissioned—produces the same four artifacts. The week is not documentation of insight; it is the production of specific, capital-consequential material you carry back into your organization.
A focused portfolio of moves you couldn’t see before Monday—each mapped to the form of capital it builds, scored for impact, and specific enough to act on. Tied to your own organization, not the wine industry.
The beliefs that, if wrong, would change a capital allocation decision only your CFO or CEO can authorize. This is the bridge from the week to the governance conversation that should follow.
A personal Canvas marked with your own live challenge, the assumptions beneath it, the small bets designed, and the next governance conversation required. Built to be read by a CFO, a CEO, or a board sponsor.
You leave carrying the Certified Capital Activator™ credential (Level 0) and the trained capability to run Think Wrong inside your own organization. Certification of course completion, consistent with how the Think Wrong Instigator Intensive has certified since 2016.
On Day 4 you complete a personal readiness self-assessment—a read across the four capabilities on the same scale a commissioning sponsor sees (Not yet → Starting → Working → Reliable). It isn’t a fifth artifact; it’s the instrument that evidences your readiness to carry the credential and shows where to keep building. You also leave with a 30-day commitment—a first internal session, a live challenge to run it on, and a dated first bet—operationalized by the 30-Day Habit Builder in Next Lab™.
For organizations that commission a cohort, the sponsors also receive a Cohort Capability Read: how far the group moved on each of the four capabilities (Not yet → Starting → Working → Reliable), so the leadership team can see what capability now lives inside the organization.
This is for leaders who make or influence consequential capital decisions and want a repeatable way to test the assumptions under them—before the money commits. It is deliberately industry-agnostic.
An AI deployment, a growth bet, a market entry, or a transformation where capital is genuinely at stake.
The field is the classroom. You’ll be in vineyards and markets by Tuesday afternoon, testing in real conditions.
You leave with material a CFO, CEO, or board sponsor can read—the escalation question is the bridge to that conversation.
You don’t work in wine—and you don’t need to. Wine is the laboratory precisely because its assumptions are visible to an outsider; that visibility is the transferable skill. Leaders have come from technology, industrial, financial-services, healthcare, and public-sector organizations.
Think Wrong has been used inside some of the most demanding organizations in the world—across technology, government, finance, aerospace, and healthcare.
Think Wrong: How to Conquer the Status Quo and Do Work That Matters was published in 2016 and is in its third printing (2025), available in English, Spanish, and Arabic. The book’s own case studies are separate from the client list above; the method is ten years old this year, and the problems it was built for are not.
The Capital Activator Intensive is designed and facilitated by a team with direct experience applying the methodology inside some of Europe’s most complex organizations—at Airbus, across Heidrick & Struggles, and throughout the leadership development contexts where assumptions are most deeply embedded and most expensive when wrong.
Greg Galle has spent more than thirty years watching the same pattern accumulate inside organizations: visible metrics that look healthy while something underneath remains fragile. He co-founded Solve Next and co-authored Think Wrong with John Bielenberg and Mike Burn—building the structured discipline that gives leaders a rigorous practice for surfacing and testing that fragility before it becomes expensive. His practitioner background spans brand strategy, organizational transformation, and leadership development across private, public, and civil sectors. He holds a BFA from the Otis Art Institute of Parsons School of Design. As the architect of the Think Wrong methodology, Greg brings both the intellectual framework and the facilitation depth that makes Friday’s transfer session the most consequential session of the week.
Louise Kyhl-Triolo brings more than twenty-five years of international leadership experience—across L’Oréal, Airbus, VMware, and Heidrick & Struggles—to the design and delivery of the Capital Activator Intensive across Europe. She works at the intersection of strategy, creativity, and leadership: coaching senior leaders, designing group experiences that shift how organizations actually work, and facilitating transformation that requires both directional clarity and genuine human change. Louise is the European program lead—the person who knows how Think Wrong translates across cultures, sectors, and the gap between a week in the field and a Monday morning back in the office. She is a Solve Next Partner and Board Member (Europe) of the Human Impacts Institute.
Romain Gravier spent more than twenty years inside Airbus as a coach, facilitator, and leadership trainer embedded in some of the organization’s most complex innovation and culture transformation programs—including FCAS and Smart Collab at Airbus Defense and Space. He has been surfacing and working with assumptions inside a large, complex engineering organization from the inside for two decades, which means he understands the forces that make organizational change genuinely difficult rather than theoretically challenging. Romain is a certified Integral Master Coach (Integral Coaching Canada) and a Certified Wrong Thinker credentialed by Solve Next. He brings the facilitation rigor that turns a week in the field into a practice participants can run themselves when they return.
Cornelia Wagner spent sixteen years inside Airbus in a sequence of roles that gave her an unusually complete picture of how large organizations learn, change, and resist change—from learning systems implementation and HR transformation to culture change management and, most recently, engineering transformation at Airbus Defense & Space. She founded Connecting Waypoints to bring transformational coaching and innovation facilitation to leaders navigating complexity. She brings to the Intensives something very few facilitators can: direct experience of what it costs when large-scale change is built on assumptions that were never tested—and the practical knowledge of what it actually takes to make a new discipline stick inside a complex organization.
By Friday most participants can name at least one assumption in their own organization that, if wrong, would change a decision only a CFO or CEO can authorize. That is the escalation question, asked at the close of Day 3, and it is the bridge to what comes next. Increasingly that assumption sits underneath an AI investment—the largest allocation many organizations are now making, and the one carrying the least evidence.
Level 0—what you leave the week carrying: the credential and the capability to run Think Wrong inside your own organization.
For an organization whose most consequential assumptions warrant a governance response, the diagnostic produces the full exposure map—and the specific actions a CFO and CEO can authorize.
Level 1, via the Capital Architects Program™—for leaders ready to build the governance capability, not just activate it.
Your path of progress runs along this capability ladder. What you practice this week is the activation discipline inside Capital Symmetry™; the Growth Gap Diagnostic™ is where the connection becomes a governance conversation. We follow up within 30 days with anyone for whom that felt real.
Almost nobody joins or commissions an Intensive alone. There is a manager, a CFO, or a board to convince—and increasingly the budget being argued over is the AI budget. These are the materials built to carry that conversation when you are not in the room.
The full picture in a single PDF: why wine, the AI question, the four capabilities, the day-by-day arc, the four artifacts, faculty, fieldwork, logistics, and the ladder beyond the week. The canonical reference—share it with anyone who needs the complete view.
What the Intensive is, who it is for, what you leave with, and when it runs—on a single page. For the moment when you have thirty seconds and one sheet of paper.
Talking points, anticipated objections, and the capital framing for the meeting where the decision actually happens. Two versions: one for making the case for your own seat, one for making the case for a commissioned cohort. Available on request.
The one question that connects the week to the governance conversation that should follow: “Of the assumptions we surfaced—which ones, if wrong, would change a capital allocation decision that only your CFO or CEO can authorize?” Bring it to the table you already sit at.
Request any of these from hello@solvenext.com. If the case you have to make is an AI one, say so—the organizational kit carries the governance framing for it, and it is the version that reaches a CFO.
Twenty seats. Four and a half days in Provence, 12–16 October 2026. Bring the decision you are carrying—an AI investment, a growth bet, a market entry. You leave a Certified Capital Activator™, with a portfolio, a set of tested assumptions, and a plan for your own organization.